阿基拉與拼字比賽的行不？老師給我這篇文章可是給了good job
Face life with a smile
Today，I read an interesting movie which name is 「Akeelah and the spelling bee. 」This movie is based on the traditional game in America called「 spelling bee」. The story is about an 11-year-old girl Akeelah Anderson. Her father died when she was five years old. During her childhood, she lived a poor life with her mother So she can』t afford going to school. Fortunately, she was born to be a good word speller ——she could remember a word instantly. One day, someone told her that she could sign up the 「spelling bee」, while her mother didn』t allow her to take part in the competition. A teacher named Larabee want to help her with spelling. At last, after a hard training process and learnt appropriate training methods, she won the championship.
I like Akeelah,for she is a sunny girl. She has an optimistic attitude towards life——she went through a lot of difficulties, but she became more confident. Each time she failed , she always said： 「It was not a big deal」. I think we should learn from Akeelah. She never complains and she overcame difficulties with her optimistic mind.
Nowadays, many people complain that life is bad. For example, if my parents don』t buy my favorite things for me, I will hate them. But to Akeelah, She doesn』t have a father and she only can talk with his photo! In this world, some children are orphans. Now think about, I meet the pain, what! So, I think I should be good to parents, and cherish the time being with them.
Many great people also have a lot of difficulties on their road of life. Such as Martin Luther King. He met Kennedy and called for the adoption of new civil rights law- the right to equality for blacks. Martin』s life is like Akeelah』s, they both don』t mind others' strange vision, proceed without hesitation to the dream, and so they can be successful.
If you want to be a great person, you need to work hard. Remember the saying: The genius is a special passion! It's not stupid, and you will get a lot. Success has many ways, but the best way is to catch any opportunity to study like a short break between classes when you can read a book or only an article; when you wait a bus on bus station, you can write a poem, when you on the way to school, you can spell some words, at least two, using the money to buy some useful books.it』s better than buying food and toy.....don』t waste time, money and energy to do useless things!
And in this story, Larabee sponsored Akeelah a lot. He made her realize their dreams, and let her have a better future. He is not only a good teacher but also making Akeelah feel the warmth from her father. At the same time he made Akeelah happy, too.
At last,I think everyone need to be confident,just like Akeelah says: Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. You are the child of God. Your playing small doesn't serve the world. There's nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine, as children do. We are born to make manifest the glory of God that is within us. It's not just in some of us; it's in all of us. And as we let our light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we're liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others.
Let』s be a good and a confident person and try to face life with smile!
⑵ 求幾部外國電影的影評
去豆瓣找就可以了
⑶ 電影on the road的影評
很多事情就是這樣，期望過高，失望過大。在「垮掉的一代」面前，電影在詮釋「垮掉」二字，卻忽視過多內在的東西。那生活是你我迷戀的-「不羈，瘋狂，自由，浪漫」，可電影絲毫沒有讓我感受到。除了性愛，大麻，音樂，還有什麼？最後那被拉回的現實，並不會震懾到我，一絲可憐而已。斯圖爾特去死吧！
額，這是發條哥2012年12月10日在豆瓣上發表的影評。
我不是原著粉，否則就是一星了。外面的世界太喧囂，於是內里生出空曠來對抗，在喧囂與空曠之間游盪，無處安放——如果不打算呈現這種精神狀態的話，勢必會變成這副流水賬德性，改編的意義又何在？我說你確定這片兒名不叫「《無因的反叛》之小清新版」嗎？選角導演好像半邊腦清醒半邊腦殘障……
這是小斑2012年6月3日在豆瓣上發表的影評。
⑷ 誰給我寫10部電影的影評，外國電影，有內容的，像勵志的什麼的
阿甘正傳
天空中，一根羽毛隨風飄舞，飄過樹梢，飛向青天……最後，它落在福雷斯·甘的腳下，阿甘把它夾進自己最喜歡的書中。他正坐在薩凡納Savannah州的一個長椅上等待去珍妮家的公交。他要與自己多年沒見的、愛慕了一生的珍妮見面。阿甘開始思緒萬千，為了消磨時間，也是為了撫平浮動的情緒，他向同坐等公車的路人訴說著自己一生的故事——
洛奇
一部劇情影片，如果不想那些花哨誇張的內容，想懷舊，記得一定要看洛奇，劇情沒有那麼發雜只需慢慢品味即可。無論你是沖著偶像還是拳擊題材......，看了給人輕松的感覺
洛奇2
洛基•巴爾博厄(西爾維斯特•史泰龍 Sylvester Stallone
飾)戰勝了世界冠軍拳王阿波羅，卻很快花光了比賽贏得的獎金。為了養家糊口，他嘗試了很多的工作，均未成功。他再三考慮，決定做回本行，重新開始他的拳擊生涯。阿波羅對於上次的失敗也非常介懷，他多次給洛奇製造麻煩，逼迫他重出江湖。雖然太太反對，但洛奇仍然緊鑼密鼓，開始做好比賽的准備，他的決心終於得到親人的支持。在親友的協助下，他苦練拳術，走上賽場，和阿波羅展開驚險搏鬥。
洛奇3
在第二次擊敗宿敵——黑人拳王阿波羅·克里德（Carl Weathers 飾）後，當初貧民窟出身的窮小子洛奇（西爾維斯特·史泰龍 Sylvester
Stallone 飾）逐漸走上事業的頂峰。
洛奇6永遠的拳王
轉眼30年過去，往日的榮光漸漸不再。曾經的傳奇拳王洛奇（西爾維斯特·史泰龍 Sylvester Stallone
飾）生活平淡乏味，心愛的妻子亞德里安（Talia Shire
飾）因癌症去世，自己與兒子的關系又分外緊張，他終日坐在所開的小餐館里追憶往昔，誰也不會想到這位拳王退休後的人生竟如此落寞。是時，新一代的拳王橫空出世，年輕的梅森·迪克遜（Antonio
Tarver 飾）統治者重量級冠軍的頭銜。 男人可以流淚，但是不可以放棄！
肖申克的救贖
看完了，久久不能釋懷，讓我深深感受到了希望的可貴之處，不論我們處於人生的低谷還是頂峰，都不能失去了對生活的希望。非常不錯的一部片子~大力支持！
喜劇之王
10年以後再回首這部電影，其中的愛情依然能打動我。這是一部周星馳個人印記很深的電影，對演藝事業的之作，你永遠是我心中的香港喜劇之王。
國王的演講
影片講述了英國女王伊麗莎白二世的父親喬治六世國王的故事。喬治六世就是那位為了美人而放棄江山的愛德華八世的弟弟，愛德華退位後，他很不情願地坐上了國王的寶座。然而喬治六世有很嚴重的口吃，發表講話時非常吃力，連幾句很簡單的話都結結巴巴地講不出來。幸運的是他遇到了語言治療師萊昂納爾（Lionel
Logue），通過一系列的訓練兩人成為好友，國王的口吃也大為好轉，隨後他發表了著名的聖誕講話，鼓舞了當時二戰中的英國軍民。
心靈捕手
謝謝導演，謝謝演員，謝謝所有的人。記憶里總是有很多好的影片讓我難以忘懷，看完後總是久久不願起身。很多年過去了，很多影片依然讓我難以平靜，還在回味那些台詞，那些表情。總之，很感謝。
舞出我人生
兩個有舞蹈天分的年輕人的激情碰撞--你可能覺得這是一個苦甜參半的青春故事，其實它更像是一個關乎夢想變為現實的美妙童話。
純自己DIY，請珍惜別人的勞動成果，勿右鍵~
⑸ 豆瓣高分電影《看不見的客人》，反轉劇情太燒腦，怎樣才能看懂
問怎麼才能看懂無非是想最直觀地知道故事在講什麼
簡單梳理一下故事脈絡，原則只有一個：透過表象看本質。男主殺了兩個人，他前面所有說辭和蒙冤叫屈都是企圖掩蓋真相的瞞天過海。而女律師的目的就是拆穿他，拆穿的手段是假意迎合，騙取男主信任，然後等待男主放下戒心，再步步緊逼索取真相。至於女律師為何這樣做？因為受害人之一正是女律師親兒子。夫婦二人喬裝易容，只為了找出兒子遺體所在。在理解了雙方角色和立場的基礎之上再看你來我往的博弈，就容易理解多了。男主外表光鮮亮麗心理極度扭曲，道貌岸然的形象在結尾呼之欲出，而夫婦二人從善良朴實到走投無路，愛子心切的悲情也被大眾看在眼裡。這種邪不壓正，歹人自有人收的結局，看得大快人心。這給享受了電影多次反轉極盡燒腦的觀眾又一次暢快沖擊。得而讓很多人走出電影院酣暢淋漓。
第三層假象：收到殺人指控的男主請了一個金牌女律師為自己脫罪。但滿口謊言
真相：女律師其實是年輕人的母親易容假扮，為了套取藏屍地點。最後男主上鉤。
至此結束大快人心。西班牙懸疑電影果然了得，推薦另一部《鏡中人》
⑹ 求經典外國電影影評---要英文版本的
珍珠港的影評
pearl harbour film review
Pearl Harbor consists of three incongruous acts, mashed together into an ungainly whole. It appears to be more interested in reprocing the success of Titanic, which also set a fictional love story amidst a tragic historical event, than it is in telling the story of the men and women who fought and died in the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Titanic worked because the central characters were interesting, the story was cohesive, the historical events were handled respectfully and with the proper dramatic tone, and underneath it all was an intelligent reflection on the human failings that permitted such a tragedy in the first place.
Pearl Harbor reces the historical backdrop into a series of action set pieces. Instead of exploring ideas inherent in the events, it extracts them, recing the reason for Japan's attack to something inexplicable at best, and having utterly nothing to say about why the attack happened, how it was carried out, or how we responded. The film is dedicated to the men who died at Pearl Harbor, but what does it dedicate to them? It does not seem very interested in them except as a tool for dramatic imagery. Consider, for example, a scene in which we learn that men are trapped in a sunken ship in the harbor. We learn this to emphasize the brutality of the attack, as if such emphasis were needed. Then the film forgets this point entirely, providing the fates of those men in a narrated line just before the closing credits. Why wasn't the third act of the film about those men, instead of a rushed covering of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo, complete with overblown crash landings and an improbable engagement with Japanese soldiers?
If you want to see a real movie about Pearl Harbor or the Doolittle Raid, one that paints a deep and accurate picture of what it was like, one you can learn from, one that pays tribute to our veterans, or even just one that functions as convincing entertainment, there is no shortage of options. Tora! Tora! Tora! chronicles the events before, ring, and after the attack from both the American and Japanese sides. Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo is as thorough a chronicle of the Doolittle Raid as is probably possible in a feature film, while also following the personal stories of a few indivials involved (any one of which is more interesting than the personal story in Pearl Harbor). The Purple Heart, one of the most heartbreaking movies I've ever seen, tells the story of Americans captured by the Japanese after the raid.
Writing off the historical aspects of the film, I am left with the love triangle that makes up the entire first act and pervades the rest of it. It is wholly uninteresting. This same story has been told better, countless times before. Not one of the three characters is fleshed out into an indivial: they are bland stereotypes, dolled up to look pretty and given trite lines that they recite to convey the illusion of genuine emotion. It's telling that it doesn't much matter to us how the love triangle is resolved. Unless they both die, she'll get one of them, and who cares which? Neither of the men are personable, and we surely suspect early on that her decision will be based more on fate than her own volition anyway. (In plots like this, it's survival of the survivors.) And so, alas, we are denied even the most basic of all elements of storytelling, namely, characters making actual decisions
⑺ 求一篇（一部歐美電影）的600字的英文影評
一般先簡要介紹一下電影內容，然後就劇情、導演、演員、攝影、音樂等某一方面進行分析評論，最後總結一下。
給你提供幾篇英文影評供參考：
http://..com/question/224018772.html
http://..com/question/223725915.html
http://..com/question/226429087.html
http://..com/question/226142095.html
⑻ 有沒有關於外國電影的影評
評論一：
片子緊湊了！
為了不讓電影淪為「動畫版」的文字說明，原著已經精簡再精簡，可還是撐足150分鍾。難得的是影片沒有遺漏任何一個解密關鍵的環節，連「白化殺手」塞拉斯的身世也用鏡頭拼接快轉，可見導演煞費苦心。兩個密碼筒變一個，復雜的密碼解釋能舍則舍，博物館館長和孫女索菲·奈芙的決裂過程一筆帶過。沒有了雜七雜八的信息，影片的確創造了環環相
扣的緊張氛圍，轉而考慮一下，如果電影也事無巨細地一一解釋，你也許要在電影院坐上整整半天！
情節太快了？
影片情節進展過快，似乎所有東西一瞬間都堆到眼前。觀眾畢竟不是訓練有素的情報人員，所以只要有一處沒有弄懂，就會一直如墜霧中。提彬爵士與羅伯特在書房中的大段對白，簡直堪比一堂宗教學講座，要是不知道「聖騎士」、「東西羅馬的分裂」、「中世紀的黑暗」，要解的密平白又多了幾重。電影放映結束後，一位年紀稍長的阿姨不斷詢問身邊的人：「這個主教怎麼不明不白就相信壞人呢？這個教堂跟前面那個白人（塞拉斯）去的是不是同一個啊？為什麼前面那個人沒找到杯子呢？……」
美女呆了？
仗著情節抓人，導演就是有本事把大牌如湯姆·漢克斯、讓·雷諾活生生變成大道具！
最讓影迷扼腕的就是奧黛麗·塔圖的造型——「我可愛的天使愛美麗啊，在這部片裡面怎麼變成保守高中女教師了！」原著中「勃艮第葡萄酒」般的發色在她身上顯得十足暗沉，藏青色職業套裝加窄身裙毫無女人味，即使為塑造一個「智慧果決」的女探員，也不至於把女性魅力掃盪干凈。沒有了愛美麗的古靈精怪，索菲·奈芙成了一個徹頭徹尾的女教師。
「文藝腔」少了！
聽說許多看原版影片的觀眾被那些西班牙詞根，法語發音搞得「七昏八素」，譯製片廠連夜趕制中文版，掃平一切語言障礙。製作精良的中文版，沒有以前譯製片的那種「毛骨悚然」的文藝腔，把許多繁難的宗教文字翻譯得十分流暢，配音演員的幽默感大有進步，喜歡開玩笑的提彬爵士即使說著標准普通話，他每次出現依然能讓觀眾爆發笑聲。
評論二：
實話實說，《達芬奇密碼》這本書本身也並非文學價值很高的作品，其中的創意、理論甚至是寫作手法都充滿了抄襲和借鑒的影子。丹·布朗唯一值得稱道的是，他用最聰明的辦法把這些東西揉在一起，並趕在一個對信仰充滿懷疑的危機年代出了這本書。
無論怎樣，對於愛好神秘科學的人來說，即使這樣一本略帶快餐文學和奇幻小品色彩的小說還是會吸引你在一個晚上連夜讀完。
加上好萊塢的大製作、漢克斯和法國天使的搭檔，也使得我對電影充滿了期待——這種期待的基礎是只希望能再現書中緊張氣氛和高智商的推理，並不指望一部根據暢銷書改編的電影能有什麼驚喜和突破。
問題在於，連這樣一種期待基本也沒能實現。電影里的漢克斯們彷彿變成解迷類RPG游戲的角色，表情做作、節奏混亂，根本不像是一部好萊塢的精美電影。
不過，我們不能責怪漢克斯和他的美麗女搭檔奧黛麗·塔圖，畢竟他們已經努力在做了，只是編劇和導演賦予他們發揮的空間實在太狹小。首先，對比原著中更加犀利和明顯地嘲諷天主教廷，電影在此弱化的太多太多。大概是考慮到天主教徒們對電影的反對吧，電影在很多情節和對白上都緩和了不少，這樣使得本應該多少能反映現代社會信仰危機的可能性喪失殆盡，關於基督的爭議在電影裡面徹頭徹尾地變成了一個戲劇的噱頭，而非嚴肅和現實的歷史問題。其次，作為原著特色之一的懸疑和緊張氣氛，在電影中幾乎僅僅單純地演變成恐怖——比方說事共會的肉體苦修、隱修會的神婚儀式等等。此外，電影的節奏把握也很成問題，雖然在150分鍾里看似迷題一個接著一個，但實際上卻令人感覺毫無變化，前30分鍾覺得刺激，後面的時間里就覺得「審美疲勞」，尤其是在電影後段中缺乏更新鮮的鏡頭的時候。
如果說，以上種種都是由於電影本身的特點不得不改變的話，那麼個人倒是認為沒有再現原著中精巧和充滿智慧的各種解迷元素反而是電影的致命傷。這就好像你在玩一個類似「古墓麗影」的游戲，第一個迷題是1+1等於幾，第二個迷題就是2+2等於幾一樣乏味。各種迷題設計的是不是令人贊嘆卻恰恰是這種冒險類電影的殺手鐧，看看以前的印第安納瓊斯系列就曉得了。
盡管如此，說了一大堆的缺點，還是要提幾個值得一看的地方。出演白化病人賽拉斯的演員保羅·貝塔尼很不錯，雖然台詞並不很多，其中還有相當一部分是我們一點也聽不懂的拉丁語，不過表情和細節動作卻十分到位。其次，雖然百分之九十九的內容都沒有改編的令人滿意，但是影片最後結尾對小說的改編卻十分有新意，甚至可以說更好一些。個人最喜歡的部分也是最後漢克斯以古代聖殿騎士的姿勢跪在抹拉大陵墓前的那一幕。
⑼ 求一些外國電影的中文影評
肖申克的救贖的影評 · 一、緣起
從來沒想過給《肖申克的救贖》寫一篇影評，也許是生怕暴露自己只是個不諳世事的初級影迷，也許是對這樣一部無法復制的影片真的不願去過多地提起。然而一場出其不意的重感冒讓我只能卧床裹被，已沒有了力氣去消化我那些故作高深、一直收著卻懶得去看的電影，不期然地拿起《肖申克的救贖》，沒想著再去感動自己一把，只是北方冬天的午後，我們就這樣莫名地重遇。
二、記憶
有一些電影可遇不可求。這「遇」只能是不期然地偶遇，有準備的相遇會讓一切黯然失色。忘了是哪一年，我莫名地租來一張名叫《刺激1995》的VCD，那時不知道誰是蒂姆
⑽ 美國 返老還童 影評
颶風只是渲染氣氛。同時也暗示著人生的不測無法自己控制。
做表那個人，希望時間會倒流 暗示著他對命運的反抗是無用的，事情永遠不能想你想的那樣發展，也讓人懂得該珍惜自己所有的一切